2009-09-27 04:31 PM - last edited on 2023-05-25 05:48 PM by Rubia Torres
2009-11-05 12:12 PM
Bob wrote:Trapezodial footing are considered economical as compared to square or a step footing(savings in concrete), atleast books suggest so,don't know in practical.
I appreciate the process of modelling a footing of this shape, but I wonder about what circumstances suggest the shape itself. This shape requires formwork for the concrete. There are much simpler ways of building footings for columns, such as square pads that do not need formwork. However, if this footing is exposed to view, I can understand the architectural merit.
2009-11-05 12:14 PM
2009-11-05 02:37 PM
creative wrote:Try OBJECTiVE - it's free for educational use. You can make your footing quite easily by cutting and rotating a simple block shape (referring to the attached image):
What is the best way to create footings for a column.
2009-11-05 09:29 PM
creative wrote:
If you are stuck on anything you can ring GSNZ on 09 4893235 and get an answer straight away. The quickest way to learn.
2009-11-19 07:13 AM
2009-11-19 07:26 AM
2009-11-19 09:54 AM
2009-11-19 04:04 PM
creative wrote:Try OBJECTiVE as noted above. It's free for students and will make the shapes you want in seconds. In this instance:
How to draw footing wall for walls between 2 such footings.The footing is drawn using mesh tool which does not have priority options.
Will it effect volume calculations if i draw a wall froM column to column(a to b in fig)?
2009-11-20 08:50 AM
2009-11-20 10:40 AM