KeesW wrote:
I thought that 'height to next' was whatever you wanted it to be. One could choose to measure the next storey to the underside of the next floor couldn't one?
I like to keep it simple and measure from floor to floor.
I then use layers to get the plans I want - site, floor, ceiling, roof.
But there is no stopping you from setting up stories for site, floor, ceiling, roof, etc.
Just remember that the "height to next" affects the height of the floor above (and all those abive that).
So long as all your "heights to next" add up to the height between your actual floor levels you can have as many stories between floors as you need.
You can even have zero height floors.
Hence why I like to use the KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) principle and go floor to floor with layer combinations.
But that is just the way I like to work - there are many alternatives.
So long as all your actual "floor" stories are at the heights of the actual floor levels then all elements (slabs, walls, roofs, etc) are simply placed with reference to that storey (as if it was at zero height).
Even as long as your intermediate stories (ceilings, roofs, etc.) are at the correct heights then you just place ceilings or roofs at zero level relative to that storey.
The way I do it is place my ceiling slab 2800mm above the ground floor - but that is logical to me because I know the ceiling is at 2800mm high.
If it had its own storey then I would make sure that storey is set up at 2800 high and place the ceiling slab at zero.
Barry.
One of the forum moderators.
Versions 6.5 to 27
i7-10700 @ 2.9Ghz, 32GB ram, GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB), Windows 10
Lenovo Thinkpad - i7-1270P 2.20 GHz, 32GB RAM, Nvidia T550, Windows 11