Learn to manage BIM workflows and create professional Archicad templates with the BIM Manager Program.
2007-08-08
01:35 AM
- last edited on
2023-05-11
12:25 PM
by
Noemi Balogh
2007-08-08 03:12 AM
2007-08-08 04:50 AM
TomWaltz wrote:It makes sense. I guess this brings me to my next question....Can the distribution of frame sets (0-100, 101-200 etc.) be set from within archicad (my main machine) so that the render jobs be divided unto the render farm? (like 0-100 gets rendered in computer 1, 101-200 in computer 2...etc).
Sort of.
When rendering the walk-through, you can render each frame to an image file (JPG, TIF, etc). With that logic, you can set each machine to render a range of frames (like 0 to 100, 101 to 200, etc).
You would then need a video editor (I like Quick Time Pro) to assemble them into a movie file.
Does that make sense?
2007-08-08 05:37 AM
junior wrote:From memory (I haven't done this for about a year, and it was in V9) you have to set up the rendering on each seperate machine - so open master copy on each computer (copied to home drive/off network to be extra safe). Then go into rendering settings of each instance and change the range of frames you are rendering.
It makes sense. I guess this brings me to my next question....Can the distribution of frame sets (0-100, 101-200 etc.) be set from within archicad (my main machine) so that the render jobs be divided unto the render farm? (like 0-100 gets rendered in computer 1, 101-200 in computer 2...etc).
Or will I have to run a different instant of archicad per range of frames?
TomWaltz wrote:Or iMovie on your mac.
You would then need a video editor (I like Quick Time Pro) to assemble them into a movie file.
2007-08-08 07:15 AM
Tom wrote:Thanks for the info. And thanks for bringing the possibility of teamwork being involved in the process. Its worth experimenting with.
From memory (I haven't done this for about a year, and it was in V9) you have to set up the rendering on each seperate machine - so open master copy on each computer (copied to home drive/off network to be extra safe). Then go into rendering settings of each instance and change the range of frames you are rendering.
I don't know if you could do something clever with teamwork? but with only 5 computers it's not to strenuous to set up each one indiviually.
TomWaltz wrote:
You would then need a video editor (I like Quick Time Pro) to assemble them into a movie file.
Tom wrote:I didnt know iMovie could be used as an assembly tool. I should look into this.
Or iMovie on your mac.
2007-08-08 11:03 AM
junior wrote:Yeah - however i have no idea where you'd start, as i don't really use teamwork. would be interested to see how you go though.
Thanks for the info. And thanks for bringing the possibility of teamwork being involved in the process. Its worth experimenting with.
junior wrote:I find it heaps easier to drive than Quicktime Pro, and having a mac, you already own it (not that QT is going to break the bank.)
I didnt know iMovie could be used as an assembly tool. I should look into this.
2007-08-08 05:52 PM
Tom wrote:When I come to it, I will definitely return to this thread with the status of my findings/progress and most likely more questions. I am currently putting my flagship computer together and I have 2 computers in my render farm (still need to setup though). I plan to acquire 3-4 more scrap computers in the upcoming month which will hopefully complete my render farm.
Yeah - however i have no idea where you'd start, as i don't really use teamwork. would be interested to see how you go though.
2007-08-10 11:16 AM
2007-08-10 06:11 PM
stefan wrote:I admit, I may have to explore other software to do what I intend to do. I personally like to keep the number of applications I use to a minimum..but still willing to explore better possibilities.
Most other software supports render-farms. Some even allow distributed bucket rendering (rendering parts of an image on different machines).