EN
these warnings are still happening prolifically. weekly for some people.
This particular instance, the users bimcloud activity shows that they are receiving & reserving, but no send has been reported. This means they have to save a pln, discard their local data, and redo half a days work or tediously copy it in from a saved pln.
Honestly, if graphisoft did nothing more than make bimcloud stable, reliable, and consistent; I'd be happy with any features or lack of in future releases. I can't tell you how demoralizing and stressful it is to talk designers down off the ledge after they lose 4-8 hours of work due to teamwork malfunction.
and NO, I will no longer be accepting the "what did they do wrong?" or "it has to be something in the file" excuses. BIMCLOUD simply does not work reliably. If there are supposed to be parameters for files to work on BIMcloud, then those need to be outlined in black and white. The "do not cross" thresholds, if it REALLY is a problem with files or user error, need to be laid bare for everyone to understand those limitations.
If it really is libraries, and attributes, and polygon count, and session reports, and library loading reports, and file size, and... that is causing this, then archicad simply does not work. Architects and designers do not have the band width to manage files to a pristine level where teamwork errors may pop up on a hair trigger.
Make BIMcloud work. Make Archicad work. Its getting harder and harder, borderline impossible, to argue in favor of graphisoft, when warnings like this are a daily reality for firms pushing the limits of design.
1 Comment
Open