But even if you could get the image of the door to show how you want it, do you really want pictures in the schedule?
I am thinking about the Layout where the door schedules are displayed.
My door schedules have a reference for the head, jamb, and sill details.
With the door schedule and the door details are all in the same Layout, a picture of the door is redundant. You can see that better in other places. Interior Elevations, Sections, 3D Views...
Also, when the picture is large enough to show any useful detail, the text of the schedule is so disproportionate than it is a very inefficient use of Layout space.
I do use the pictures in my schedules sometimes, especially when I want to add some dimensions or other annotation. But it is always a bit awkward since we can't adjust the size of the cells well enough to make it work very well.
Also, is the picture any use to the person using the schedule? Are they getting any important information that is not communicated better in some other way?
Just some my thoughts about it. I do like the idea of graphics, but only so far as it it more useful than the other options.
ArchiCAD 25 7000 USA - Windows 10 Pro 64x - Dell 7720 64 GB 2400MHz ECC - Xeon E3 1535M v6 4.20GHz - (2) 1TB M.2 PCIe Class 50 SSD's - 17.3" UHD IPS (3840x2160) - Nvidia Quadro P5000 16GB GDDR5 - Maxwell Studio/Render 5.2.1.49- Multilight 2 - Adobe Acrobat Pro - ArchiCAD 6 -25