2006-08-27 01:37 AM
2006-10-05 09:43 AM
2006-10-05 11:17 AM
gkmethy wrote:ok. you win! never enter an arse-kicking competition with a porcupine, right?
There is no Intel Mac SketchUp framework yet, that is why we can not create the Intel Mac add-on.
2006-10-05 11:18 AM
gkmethy wrote:--->
There's no Intel Mac SketchUp, and there is no Intel Mac SketchUp framework that we could use to build an add-on. We'll have to wait till it's released.
2006-10-06 08:57 PM
gkmethy wrote:Could I ask for some further clarification on this?
We use the sketchup framework to read Sketchup files. This is a kind of interface between the SketchUp file and the Archicad add-on. (our add-on communicates with the framework). There is no Intel Mac SketchUp framework yet, that is why we can not create the Intel Mac add-on.
2006-10-06 11:29 PM
ddeyarza wrote:One of the limitations of Apple's Rosetta translation engine (that lets PPC programs run on Intel) is that it doesn't translate PARTS of programs. The whole program has to run in the same environment. This means, among other things, that Archicad 10/PPC plugins, add-ons etc, don't work with Archicad 10/MacIntel. One example that has annoyed some of us is the WIBU licence key verifier.
I understand that there is no Intel Mac version of SketchUp, however, there is an Intel Mac version of AC10.
2006-10-07 05:18 AM
2006-10-07 01:17 PM
ddeyarza wrote:Well, at least there is a workaround. I don't know about AC10/Win + parallells (maybe someone else has tested?) , but at least the AC10/Win + Bootcamp solution should work.
It seems that we are always waiting for one or the other to play catch up. Now Maxon came out with Cinema 4D 10 so we'll have to wait for AC10 to interact with IT (I use it instead of MaxonForm).
2006-10-11 01:04 AM
2006-10-11 02:53 AM
2006-10-11 07:18 AM