2006-06-08 05:28 AM
2007-02-07 05:42 AM
Matthew wrote:some are. other longstanding quirks are still there. but it looks nicer!
It has some annoying quirks (which may be sorted in the new version which I haven't installed yet) but it does the job with minimum fuss and bother.
2007-02-07 01:23 PM
2007-02-07 03:56 PM
2007-02-08 07:41 AM
~/archiben wrote:Does it still mess up the notes field in imported iCal entries?Matthew wrote:some are. other longstanding quirks are still there. but it looks nicer!
It has some annoying quirks (which may be sorted in the new version which I haven't installed yet) but it does the job with minimum fuss and bother.
ben
2007-02-08 01:00 PM
Matthew wrote:I used Timelog 2 for about 2 years on my Powerbook and didn't get any problems at all. I also ran Timelog 3 for a short time, again without a hitch. I haven't tried them out on the MB Pro yet but I don't expect they will perform any differently (famous last words!)
Does it still mess up the notes field in imported iCal entries?
2007-02-08 03:45 PM
Philip wrote:Timelog 3 seems pretty good so far. It lacks quite a few of the features of iBiz but also seems to lack the bugs and quirks. The reporting with HTML templates seems a bit clunky but may be wonerfully flexible once I set something up.
I used Timelog 2 for about 2 years on my Powerbook and didn't get any problems at all. I also ran Timelog 3 for a short time, again without a hitch. I haven't tried them out on the MB Pro yet but I don't expect they will perform any differently (famous last words!)
2007-02-08 04:49 PM
2007-02-09 09:22 AM
Fritz wrote:Thanks for the warning. I generally don't expect
The one thing that I dislike about Timelog is that it's data entry items overlap or "interfere" with iCal functions...
2007-02-09 12:26 PM
Matthew wrote:If you want logic, don't trust a computer program!
... then refusing to ever forget them no matter how hard I try to delete them - very stupid in my opinion.
2007-02-14 03:49 AM