We value your input! Please participate in Archicad 28 Home Screen and Tooltips/Quick Tutorials survey
2022-05-31 04:39 PM
I'm working on an elevation where I have an AC Object as a shower, and a 2D fill for tiles. The 2D-fill is now covering the shower, and it doesn't matter if I do display order > Send To Back on the Fill (Or bring to front on the shower obejct). Is it possible to move the 2D fill behind the shower object? My other option is to cut a hole in the 2D fill, but there must be a better/faster way to solve this I assume.
Solved! Go to Solution.
2022-05-31 05:07 PM - edited 2022-05-31 05:09 PM
You can't send 2D elements behind a 3D elements in elevation/section views in the same way you can in plan views.
The faster way is to model the Tile wall as a separate wall instead of doing 2D fills, this way you have a 3D element that would actually be behind the 3D shower kit and show up correctly without having to send anything back/foward. In my opinion, modeling the 3D wall is much quicker than having to add 2D fills in every elevation/and then having to modify it if any changes occur.
If you are still inclined to do it with fills, you can always cut away the shape of the shower kit. a "Quick but not very BIMinimalistic" way to do so would be:
1. copy/paste (⌘+C/⌘+V) the 3D shower kit element into your elevation (which will paste the 2D version of it = linework/fills )
2. It will probably split the fill and lines into a bunch of pieces so you can select all the shower kit fills and use the "fill consolidation..." command to join the fills.
3. Select your tile 2D fill > right-click > Select and activate tool > spacebar click on the shower kit's consolidated fill from step 2. This should cut a hole in your fill.
I still think it's a better practice and quicker to model the 3D tile wall.
2022-05-31 05:07 PM - edited 2022-05-31 05:09 PM
You can't send 2D elements behind a 3D elements in elevation/section views in the same way you can in plan views.
The faster way is to model the Tile wall as a separate wall instead of doing 2D fills, this way you have a 3D element that would actually be behind the 3D shower kit and show up correctly without having to send anything back/foward. In my opinion, modeling the 3D wall is much quicker than having to add 2D fills in every elevation/and then having to modify it if any changes occur.
If you are still inclined to do it with fills, you can always cut away the shape of the shower kit. a "Quick but not very BIMinimalistic" way to do so would be:
1. copy/paste (⌘+C/⌘+V) the 3D shower kit element into your elevation (which will paste the 2D version of it = linework/fills )
2. It will probably split the fill and lines into a bunch of pieces so you can select all the shower kit fills and use the "fill consolidation..." command to join the fills.
3. Select your tile 2D fill > right-click > Select and activate tool > spacebar click on the shower kit's consolidated fill from step 2. This should cut a hole in your fill.
I still think it's a better practice and quicker to model the 3D tile wall.
2022-05-31 05:29 PM
Thank you! And I agree, doing it in 3D sounds like a better workflow in the long run
2022-05-31 06:13 PM
No problem! you'll see once you have made some tile wall surfaces that work for you, and set a tile wall as a favorite it will be a breeze!
If you deal with this often, A couple of additional suggestions that you can include in your template which will make your life much easier and should not take you more than 30 minutes to set up:
2022-06-01 07:46 AM
Very helpful, thanks!