General discussions
Posts about job ads, news about competitions, events, learning resources, research, etc.

Graphisoft public roadmap - Follow-up conversation

Gordana Radonic
Community Manager
Community Manager

Dear Community, 

 

We're excited to have published our roadmap!

We'd love to hear your thoughts and questions. Please feel free to use this thread for discussion.

 

Graphisoft Insights announcement: https://community.graphisoft.com/t5/Graphisoft-Insights/Graphisoft-public-roadmap/ba-p/375281

 

Public roadmap on the Graphisoft website.

 

Thank you.

Gordana Radonić

Community Manager

316 REPLIES 316

I don't want to get bogged down in the pro's and cons of individual products or their costs, there are two fundamental elements to the design process, the designer and how they communicate. The designer will find a solution to communicate their design which will be based on personal circumstances and client expectation. Whilst at one extreme you may have users oriented to AI driven and inevitably expensive & complex solutions for huge BIM and infrastructure projects, at the other extreme is the designer filling the gaps which can be as simple as adaptation of a structure for mobility / accessibility needs to comply with local code / regulation. The successful software solution is the one which covers the middle ground and delivers a solution that is easy to use. Inevitably GS will choose their own development path based on their financial drivers, (user feedback doesn't seem to carry much weight just now).

 

So the question each user has to ask... In a subscription driven market where loyalty carries no value, do you take the ever more complex usability path with the additional burden of irrelevant tools & cost, or do you look for an effective alternative workflow, which is simpler and more affordable for your communication needs? 

Apple iMac Intel i9 / macOS Sonoma / AC27UKI (most recent builds.. if they work)

I agree about Sktechup. Even though i absolutely hate it, i know first hand what it can do in capable hands; and its modular approach with its many add-ons, ensures that the core product stays clean and accesible for the new users.

 

Archicad, on the other hand, its suffering the path that clean and elegant software like Evernote suffered in its time or what Dropbox is suffering right now, which is: investing on adding non-essential features nobody asked for that bloat the software until it turns it into an unsuable mess, just to justify a suscription cost, without realizing that the core software is what we actually wanted all along. 

 

Great example with Evernote... I moved on to Notion!

Rex Maximilian, Honolulu, USA - www.rexmaximilian.com
ArchiCAD 27 (user since 3.4, 1991)
16" MacBook Pro; M1 Max (2021), 32GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, 32-Core GPU
Apple Vision Pro w/ BIMx
Creator of the Maximilian ArchiCAD Template System

I had never seen such a beautiful software, that is evernote, being so completely trashed by wrong minded people.  In another thread Karl Ottenstein mentioned it is actually getting better again, but i wont even try it by now. Same will happen with Archicad if they dont change direction fast.

 

Graphisoft, you showed your cards and apparently almost no one liked it. What are  you (and we) going to do?


@jl_lt wrote:

I had never seen such a beautiful software, that is evernote, being so completely trashed by wrong minded people.  In another thread Karl Ottenstein mentioned it is actually getting better again, but i wont even try it by now.


Someone else;  I've never used Evernote.

 

One of the forum moderators
AC 27 USA and earlier   •   macOS Ventura 13.6.3, MacBook Pro M2 Max 12CPU/30GPU cores, 32GB

@DGSketcher wrote:

So the question each user has to ask... In a subscription driven market where loyalty carries no value, do you take the ever more complex usability path with the additional burden of irrelevant tools & cost, or do you look for an effective alternative workflow, which is simpler and more affordable for your communication needs? 


That is definitely a pressing question for any user that want to remain effective and competitive. Such alternative workflows has started to emerge and will definitely continue to do so at an increasing rate with solutions like Speckle and other open source projects acting as drivers. It might seem utopic but I think that many small to mid size offices soon will be able to rely on such workflows rather than taking on recurring expenses for features that don't carry their own cost whether by being irrelevant or being limited/underdeveloped.

 

There will still be a need for a main application but it will be evaluated on how well it facilitate the fundamentals of the design/model/documentation process and anything extraneous will either be disregarded or seen as negative. 

 

Archicad have a head start in the race but seem to wander off course rather than setting the shortest path and picking up speed. Coming up behind them are applications like Rhino and Blender or even Sketchup or Sharpr3D who all make up a lot ground with the development being geared towards user-centric design functionalities.

EserDuzcan
Participant

Thank you for sharing the roadmap.

Personally, it feels good to know what's coming beforehand.

 

Especially these can be efficient for my workflows:

  • Enhancement: Interactive Schedule formatting
  • Issue Creation on BIMx Mobile.

I would vote on these topics on under research to be prioritised: 

  • Issue synchronization on BIMx
  • OPEN BIM workflow support on BIMcloud
  • Support IDS (buildingSMART Standard) in Archicad.

I can suggest a couple of new ones:

  • Ability to combine layouts into a new compound layout
  • A section dedicated to all penset selections that are available for the selected item in the settings window for custom penset structure users
  • Detailed and mass control over properties and attributes through schedules

Great work.

Best of luck.

Eser Düzcan, Izmir - Turkey | LinkedIn
AC26 INT 5002
Win10 | R7 3800X | 32GB | RTX 2080
Tim Ball
Expert

Hi Gordana

 

What will happen to all these comments?

Tim Ball

AC26, iMac

User since V5

I don't see them carrying over to the RoadMap interactive comment section when it's activated. I suspect the comments here will just remain and the discussion will become dormant. But we can always reference them here with permalinks and paste them in the Roadmap... or copy the text from a comment here and paste there/

Rex Maximilian, Honolulu, USA - www.rexmaximilian.com
ArchiCAD 27 (user since 3.4, 1991)
16" MacBook Pro; M1 Max (2021), 32GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, 32-Core GPU
Apple Vision Pro w/ BIMx
Creator of the Maximilian ArchiCAD Template System

Rex,

 

I am in the process of writing a summary that collects all user feedback I find on various platforms and get it to the people within Graphisoft who need to know about it. It will not be dormant and forgotten.

Get Archicad Tips at https://twitter.com/laszlonagy
AMD Ryzen 1700X CPU, 48 GB RAM, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), WIN10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac27
Loving Archicad since 1995

Thanks Laszlo. The reason for my saying that things may be dormant and forgotten, or that the conduit from user feedback forums to GS is filtered to an almost impenetrable degree is no commentary on you, but rather because as a long time user I've seen years of feedback and feature wishes that have been "extremely" popular and widely discussed never see the light of day on subsequent ArchiCAD releases.

While I feel that more people from R&D, as well as corporate, should be active on here; I appreciate the job you are doing.

Rex Maximilian, Honolulu, USA - www.rexmaximilian.com
ArchiCAD 27 (user since 3.4, 1991)
16" MacBook Pro; M1 Max (2021), 32GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, 32-Core GPU
Apple Vision Pro w/ BIMx
Creator of the Maximilian ArchiCAD Template System

Thanks.

 

Get Archicad Tips at https://twitter.com/laszlonagy
AMD Ryzen 1700X CPU, 48 GB RAM, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), WIN10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac27
Loving Archicad since 1995

Tim,

 

I am in the process of writing a summary that collects all user feedback I find on various platforms and get it to the people within Graphisoft who need to know about it.

Get Archicad Tips at https://twitter.com/laszlonagy
AMD Ryzen 1700X CPU, 48 GB RAM, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), WIN10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac27
Loving Archicad since 1995

Hmm. I was just thinking how that might be a job for AI and Notion. 

Todd Oeftger
AC27 Mac MacBook Pro 15", 2019, 2.3 GHz i9, 32GB, Radeon Pro 560X 4GB, 500GB SSD, 32" Samsung Display (2560x1440)
Bruce
Expert

In my signature is a link to a mindmeister mindmap of my own Archicad improvements wishlist that I've been maintaining for over a decade.  The greyed-out items are ones that used to be only wishes, but have since become part of Archicad.  There are a lot.

 

I don't know if this is coincidence, but it's evidence that Graphisoft constantly improves the software, and fix existing tools (e.g. Beam cover fills).  Sometimes it may take a while, but they are constantly at work.

Bruce Walker
www.brucepwalker.com
Barking Dog BIM YouTube
Mindmeister Mindmap
-- since v8.1 --
AC26 5002 INT Full | Windows 11 64 Pro | 12th Gen Intel i7-12700H 2.30 GHz | 64 Gb RAM | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 32 Gb

Have you compared your list with the last three or four updates? Because that is where the falloff of core architectural tools fell off.

Rex Maximilian, Honolulu, USA - www.rexmaximilian.com
ArchiCAD 27 (user since 3.4, 1991)
16" MacBook Pro; M1 Max (2021), 32GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, 32-Core GPU
Apple Vision Pro w/ BIMx
Creator of the Maximilian ArchiCAD Template System

A very nice format to your list Bruce. Easy to see and to follow, we need more of that over here for people like me who like diagrams with written explanations.

AC8.1 - AC27 ARM AUS + CI Tools
Apple Mac Studio M1 Max Chip 10C CPU
24C GPU 7.8TF 32GB RAM OS Ventura
mthd
Mentor

We all understand that the 3D structural model forms a critical part of the project and that can dictate how spaces are adjusted to allow for structural and MEP components. That doesn’t mean that the Archicad core development should slow down by any respects like it apparently has particularly with version 26. And what other professionals users have observed with prior versions.

AC8.1 - AC27 ARM AUS + CI Tools
Apple Mac Studio M1 Max Chip 10C CPU
24C GPU 7.8TF 32GB RAM OS Ventura
Flarback
Participant

Hi Gordana,

Maybe I missed this but I can't help but to notice that there is no sign of Python or Grasshopper anywhere in the roadmap...

It's been a few years since you launched the Python palette, it still feels like a simple marketing scheme. The automation possibilities are completely crippled by the fact that you can neither create new objects nor deconstruct existing ones. Any plans for when you will enable better functionality in the Python palette, so that we can start automating our process for real (like most other programs can, Revit, 3DsMax, Rhino to name a few...).

I get that the Grasshopper live link can do some of this, but since it's release it's always been unstable to use, frequent crashing. With the startup time of Archicad this is not a pleasant ride... Additionally it relies on other software with separate license costs. At bigger companies where many colleagues can't handle Grasshopper, automation with Python inside Archicad would reach an order of magnitude wider.

For a modern professional program, focused on architecture, I think the priorities of development should be in Architectural design, not Structural/MEP. New design related functions, and efficiency improvements (such as automation) is to me what should come first!

Grasshopper is mentioned in Research and Idea Pool.

We are also looking forward getting more stability, performance and features in with GH & AC

AC25, BIMCloud, Windows

I do agree on that, it was promised to be continiousely developped.

AC12_20 |Win10_64bit|

Still looking?

Browse more topics

Back to forum

See latest solutions

Accepted solutions

Start a new discussion!