Saved library part does not show correctly in SE2011

[Michael Reed]

I have been working on some objects for a template in SE2011 and get an odd thing happening as follows.
I take an inclined block object, amend its details to suit say a barge board, then save the selection to an embedded file.
When I try to use the object from the new file I get a small green dot only and no outline of the object on the model plan.
It is fine in elevations and perspectives etc, but because I only have a dot on the plan it is no good.
Can anyone advise please.

[Anonymous]

It is unlikely many of the usual suspects in this forum have SE2011 (small pool...).
If you have access to a full version, replicate your steps exactly, see if you get the same problem.

[Michael Reed]

I downloaded a trial Archicad 17, and it works fine in that, so I guess its an issue with SE2011.

[Michael Reed]

I have tried it again but now in windows 7 via bootcamp on my imac and I get a warning dialogue box as per attached screen shot, but I do not understand which "left brackets" are being referred to, or even if this is anything to do with it.

[Laszlo Nagy]

Could it be something in the Master Script.
I seem to recall that when the Master Script has content, its lines are counted as part of the other scripts since it is executed before them.
Just a guess, I haven't tested it.

[Michael Reed]

There would appear to be script in the master script pane.
If I delete lines 16, 17, 18, and 19 it then warns of further errors in lines 188 etc etc and I don't know were these are.

[Michael Reed]

Sorry last reply should have said there was NO SCRIPT in the master script pane.

[Laszlo Nagy]

I checked the GDL documentation and it says that the GLOB_CUTPLANES_INFO variable is an array. But it is a one-dimensional array whereas the script now shows it as a two-dimensional array. So it should look like this:

GLOB_CUTPLANES_INFO[1] =       1.1
GLOB_CUTPLANES_INFO[2] =       3.1
GLOB_CUTPLANES_INFO[3] =       0
GLOB_CUTPLANES_INFO[4] =       0

Please try to delete those [1] array indexes. Those make it a two-dimensional array and I believe they are unneccessary.

[Michael Reed]

Thanks laszlonagy that seems to have worked ok, much appreciated Mike