Modeling
About Archicad's design tools, element connections, modeling concepts, etc.

ARCHICAD 19 Reviews

Laszlo Nagy
Community Admin
Community Admin
Loving Archicad since 1995 - Find Archicad Tips at x.com/laszlonagy
AMD Ryzen9 5900X CPU, 64 GB RAM 3600 MHz, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), Windows 10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac27
48 REPLIES 48
Daniel Ward
Enthusiast
To be honest, I'm a little curious as to why an ArchiCAD 19 Beta Tester would be posting questions in the Public Forum about the ArchiCAD 19 support for GPU rendering? Strange.
+MAP Architects, Christchurch - New Zealand
ArchiCAD 4.12 - ArchiCAD 27 || Octane for ArchiCAD
i9-12900KF - 64Gb RAM - Gigabyte RTX 3080 12Gb - Window 11
James wrote:
Bricklyne wrote:
ArchiCAD uses your GPU for the 3D Window functions when modeling and working in 3D.

That's what the OpenGL implementation entails.

(conversely, your 2D window functions - Sections, elevations, plans etc - leverage the CPU and more pointedly the multicore capability of multicore CPU's (which pretty much all computers are these days))
We use OpenGL also in 2D windows (on Mac, PC I think uses DirectX), so things like panning, input, trace/reference etc can utilise OpenGL to provide feedback. We have also made improvements to speed these up in AC19, as well as with the 3D navigation as already mentioned.
Wouldn't that depend on the specific Graphics card (I'm talking on the PC side) ?

Like whether it's NVIDIA or AMD?

Or am I confusing OpenGL with OpenCL (versus CUDA, which I'm certain is limited to NVIDIA) and in which case does OpenCL play any role in the graphics handling that ArchiCAD does (I know it's important in GPU rendering)?

I do know that certain programs allow you to choose between Direct X and OpenGL processing for your Graphics cards (like Google Earth, for instance - and in my case OpenGL is the default) depending on how well (or badly) it handled each implementation.

Not to get too technical or wonky....
Anonymous
Not applicable
The situation where you have two cards one intel and one quadro is to save the battery. We are typically turning it off (intel) on all out machines (dell M6800). It's creating more problems than it solves. By default if you have it on it is managing the main display and the 3D performance is quite dismal in comparison. Just use quadro and call it a day.
Miki wrote:
The situation where you have two cards one intel and one quadro is to save the battery. We are typically turning it off (intel) on all out machines (dell M6800). It's creating more problems than it solves. By default if you have it on it is managing the main display and the 3D performance is quite dismal in comparison. Just use quadro and call it a day.
Thanks for that input. Is there any specific settings you use for your Quadro card ?

ArchiCAD 25 7000 USA - Windows 10 Pro 64x - Dell 7720 64 GB 2400MHz ECC - Xeon E3 1535M v6 4.20GHz - (2) 1TB M.2 PCIe Class 50 SSD's - 17.3" UHD IPS (3840x2160) - Nvidia Quadro P5000 16GB GDDR5 - Maxwell Studio/Render 5.2.1.49- Multilight 2 - Adobe Acrobat Pro - ArchiCAD 6 -25

KeesW
Advocate
Are professional Quadro type cards really faster than high end NVidia 'gaming' cards? The frame rate for gaming cards is very high - higher than Quadro cards, I think. If not speed, what do the professional cards offer? If one does good quality architectural work comprising the usual plans, elevations, sections and some 3D to illustrate proposals without making presentation one's life's work, is it worth paying the extra for high end graphic cards?

From the discussions, and improvements in AC19, it seems that having lots of cores in the main CPU is more important for productivity. Or have I misunderstood the posts?
Cornelis (Kees) Wegman

cornelis wegman architects
AC 5 - 26 Dell XPS 8940 Win 10 16GB 1TB SSD 2TB HD RTX 3070 GPU
Laptop: AC 24 - 26 Win 10 16GB 1TB SSD RTX 3070 GPU
Matt Balaam
Advocate
KeesW wrote:
If one does good quality architectural work comprising the usual plans, elevations, sections and some 3D to illustrate proposals without making presentation one's life's work, is it worth paying the extra for high end graphic cards?
It seems to be a common misconception with many ArchiCAD users that a high end graphics card will make a huge difference to the overall performance of ArchiCAD.

From all of the testing our company has done (and there has been a fair bit) the graphics card doesn't make a lot of difference. In my opinion, assuming you aren't doing regular rendering, you are better off saving some money on the graphics card and getting an SSD, followed by a better processor. RAM is also cheap so there's no reason not to have plenty.

We've also found that it's not always the type of graphics card you have but the exact driver version that can make quite a substantial difference. Some driver versions work with ArchiCAD a lot better than others.
AC24 (7000 AUS FULL)| Windows 10 Pro | Intel Core i7-12700 @ 2.1GHz | 32GB RAM | NVidia T1000
KeesW
Advocate
Thanks Matt. Your hardware is pretty high end - Dell workstation perhaps?
Cornelis (Kees) Wegman

cornelis wegman architects
AC 5 - 26 Dell XPS 8940 Win 10 16GB 1TB SSD 2TB HD RTX 3070 GPU
Laptop: AC 24 - 26 Win 10 16GB 1TB SSD RTX 3070 GPU
Matt Balaam
Advocate
HP Z230 workstation actually. It also runs off an SSD so it's super fast!
AC24 (7000 AUS FULL)| Windows 10 Pro | Intel Core i7-12700 @ 2.1GHz | 32GB RAM | NVidia T1000
Anonymous
Not applicable
Is there a release date yet?

Thanks,
Uli
Anonymous
Not applicable
atelier522 wrote:
Is there a release date yet?

Thanks,
Uli

"GRAPHISOFT ARCHICAD® 19 will start shipping in June, 2015"

http://www.nemetschek.com/en/presse/press-releases/detail/archicad-19-faster-than-ever/