Learn to manage BIM workflows and create professional Archicad templates with the BIM Manager Program.
2006-04-26 01:54 PM
2006-04-28 10:16 AM
2006-04-28 11:43 AM
2006-04-28 03:05 PM
Aussie wrote:I use lbks for quick reference extensively (I do stock plans and have many, and many phone questions), and I will miss that... but there are enough trade-offs that I'm not too concern. If you are using pmks for you title blocks from a dedicated file, those will import fine from the external AC9 file, after you convert it, (you will need to open the lbk and save as a 10 file and merge). My title blocks are external and will continue that, so that I can make changes to all of my file's title blocks at once. If they are not linked to the pln file in the lbk, but are pmks, you will first need to link them to the pln file before merging into AC10, but you can do that and it works fine for me. However, that said, I plan on merging my AC9 pln files into a AC10 template file w/sheets, notes, details, and title blocks and re-placing the views. That seems faster to me than opening the lbk and re-linking to the pln, then saving as an AC10 file, then merging and fiddling with it. My files are typically small, 6-10 sheets, so you milage will vary with the project size.
I'm of mixed feeling of the plotmaker/Archicad merge as I often use Plotmaker for quick reference to the drawing set...
Mind you I do use generic PMK files for my title blocks (in conjunction with the book info and auto text) and wonder how this might be handled now.
I hope dont have to wait till version 11 for universal binaries for the intel macs to run
2006-04-28 06:09 PM
2006-04-29 04:58 AM
oreopoulos wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe there has been any REAL enhancement to the calculation tools since version 6.5!
...AC 10 is a good upgrade but unfortunatelly not a great one...
1) If you remember well i was shouting that with the introduction of the constuctor-estimator suite, we will see NO development in the calculation tools for Archicad. Unfortunately i am VERY VERY correct here. Not a single new feature for the calculation model.. And that is the second version in a row without a single improvement.
2006-04-29 10:41 AM
2006-04-29 03:03 PM
2006-04-30 06:02 AM
gpowless wrote:
If there is a list of all the changes it would help to get right into the enhancements instead of 8 months later discovering that there is an easier way to do the same thing.
oreopoulos wrote:same document, pages 60-63 . . . (document pages
I.S is a very good tool. But since then... nothing....
2006-04-30 01:10 PM
2006-05-01 10:44 AM