Connecting Two Different Railings
Anonymous
Not applicable
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-09-23
10:52 PM
- last edited on
2023-05-23
06:00 PM
by
Rubia Torres
2019-09-23
10:52 PM

6 REPLIES 6
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-09-23 11:19 PM
2019-09-23
11:19 PM
Morph is possibly your best method. Very difficult to get it to work by adjusting the parameters
Richard Wilden Design. Ltd
Dunedin, New Zealand.
Imac 27" i9 3.6GHz; 32GB Ram Mac OS 11.3
Archicad V23:V24
Dunedin, New Zealand.
Imac 27" i9 3.6GHz; 32GB Ram Mac OS 11.3
Archicad V23:V24
Anonymous
Not applicable
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-09-24 01:31 AM
2019-09-24
01:31 AM
rjwilden wrote:That's what I was thinking as well. After digging through the parameters of my rail for almost an hour, I figured morph might be the best option. It will just be a bit time consuming.
Morph is possibly your best method. Very difficult to get it to work by adjusting the parameters

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-09-24 01:52 AM
2019-09-24
01:52 AM
To speed things up, just draw the main handrail all the way to the bottom, so the connection of the wooden corner should look good. Then only select the bottom handrail - convert to morph and delete anything you don't need, that should be fairly fast.
Carsten
www.asmtechbase.com
https://www.youtube.com/asmtechbase
AC 3 to 26 -Windows 7 - 24GB - 8core 4.4Ghz
www.asmtechbase.com
https://www.youtube.com/asmtechbase
AC 3 to 26 -Windows 7 - 24GB - 8core 4.4Ghz

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-09-24 03:13 AM
2019-09-24
03:13 AM
There is not really a need to convert it to a morph. Edit the segment instead? In the lower segment, you can just turn off the balusters and change the fixing type.
In that was it stays associated to your stairs and if you need to change anything, you can reset the rail rather than redraw it.
Ling.
In that was it stays associated to your stairs and if you need to change anything, you can reset the rail rather than redraw it.
Ling.
AC22-28 AUS 3110 | Help Those Help You - Add a Signature |
Self-taught, bend it till it breaks | Creating a Thread |
Win11 | i9 10850K | 64GB | RX6600 | Win11 | R5 2600 | 16GB | GTX1660 |

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-09-24 06:42 AM
2019-09-24
06:42 AM
Nice one Ling that should work !
Carsten
www.asmtechbase.com
https://www.youtube.com/asmtechbase
AC 3 to 26 -Windows 7 - 24GB - 8core 4.4Ghz
www.asmtechbase.com
https://www.youtube.com/asmtechbase
AC 3 to 26 -Windows 7 - 24GB - 8core 4.4Ghz
Anonymous
Not applicable
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2019-09-25 01:39 AM
2019-09-25
01:39 AM
Lingwisyer wrote:Thanks Ling, that is a very good idea. I will give it a try.
There is not really a need to convert it to a morph. Edit the segment instead? In the lower segment, you can just turn off the balusters and change the fixing type.
In that was it stays associated to your stairs and if you need to change anything, you can reset the rail rather than redraw it.
Ling.
