2009-01-08 07:09 AM - last edited on 2023-05-25 05:09 PM by Rubia Torres
2009-01-12 01:47 PM
Link wrote:Great!... I guess I'll use SEO more frequently...
I would say not - for columns at least. Element Information still lists the trimmed volume and a schedule can list the (net) volume.
2009-01-12 05:24 PM
Link wrote:AFAIK, SEOs are counted in volume calcs on all the basic model elements (walls, roofs, slabs etc.). Scripted parts of course are more complex.Braza wrote:I would say not - for columns at least. Element Information still lists the trimmed volume and a schedule can list the (net) volume.
The only problem that I see with the utilization of SEO in this kind of situation is that quantities are compromised...
Or not?...
Cheers,
Link.
2009-01-13 04:14 AM
2009-01-13 04:25 AM
David wrote:I keep them simple when I need them for quantities so I can keep track of the effects, but I agree that we desperately need better SEO management. At least we can see what items are related by selecting one in 3D.
Try unknitting a SEO issue, you will find it is impossible.
SEO do not work with IFCI haven't had any problem with this yet though I haven't pushed it hard. There are the silly IFCopenings to be deleted though.
SEO's do not work (reliably) with hotlinksThis can be tricky for obvious reasons. With proper discipline it is manageable.
SEO's slow the file downOn my machine it takes an awful lot of SEOs before it becomes too tedious
Apart from that they are greatI love 'em despite their limitations. I would sure hate to be without them.
2009-01-13 04:40 AM