2003-12-17 02:01 PM
2003-12-17 07:45 PM
2003-12-17 07:47 PM
2003-12-17 10:21 PM
archibaldo wrote:We did six variations on the shadows, line weights and colours and settled on the one you see. If it is a bit insipid then I suppose that's what happens when a committee makes the decision
try more contrast and cast shadow vibration- more visual saturation
over the building
i preffer more sculptural , phisical , volumetry description
not a discrete one for a such circular building representation
2003-12-17 10:28 PM
archibaldo wrote:I have used that method as well but in this case the model wasn't good enough as the curved roofs were not modelled in 3d and the some of the windows and fenestration was amended at the last minute and we basically didn't have enough time to sort it out let alone wait for the renderings.
I allways use for the frontal elevation a photoshop worked realistic image with the building and i bring to front the vectorial lines of the elevation and elevation quotes
congratulations for the simplified background chromatic
2003-12-18 05:17 PM
2003-12-18 05:56 PM
tprokop wrote:Moved to Tips&Tricks, at
Another way would be to create the gradient fill through Archicad. We have done this in the past and it has worked. Create the fill by drawing a generic arced wall and use a 3D vectoral hatching to show a pattern on the wall in a elevation view. Create a elevation showing the outside of the wall. Open the elevation and select the wall (it will have a gradient pattern applied due to the curve). With the wall selected, copy to the clipboard. From there, create a new symbol fill, paste the image, and scale the settings as needed to show the design. By setting the fill origin and layering the fills, this will give you a gradient effect without using the other programs.