2004-11-22
05:46 PM
- last edited on
2023-05-30
01:05 PM
by
Rubia Torres
2004-11-22 06:11 PM
2004-11-22 06:41 PM
2004-11-24 07:50 PM
2004-11-24 10:36 PM
DHURD wrote:As I suspected, this is the problem. Your views must be defined with named layer combinations to ever expect consistent behavior. Never trust a saved view that has "custom" as the layer combination name.
I don't even have any saved layer combinations.
2004-11-25 12:30 AM
2004-11-25 06:35 AM
Adalbert wrote:You comment has nothing to do with this thread (as typical of your negative comments), and is negative without justification. 9.0R1/V1 is a stable, productive release and is not the topic here in any case. (The issue discussed applies to 8.1 as well.)
Advice:
Newer use a release ending in 0 (as 9.0) unless you are non profit.
2004-11-25 08:04 PM
Karl wrote:To go even further back, it applies to 7.0 too.Adalbert wrote:You comment has nothing to do with this thread (as typical of your negative comments), and is negative without justification. 9.0R1/V1 is a stable, productive release and is not the topic here in any case. (The issue discussed applies to 8.1 as well.)
Advice:
Newer use a release ending in 0 (as 9.0) unless you are non profit.
2004-11-30 12:46 AM
2004-11-30 05:56 AM
DHURD wrote:Yes and no.
Isn't defining view sets and defining layer combinations redundant? Doesn't a view set save the layer combination?