cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Floor plan view setting consistency

Patrick M
Advisor

would love to see some consistency here:

Screenshot 2024-03-08 at 7.41.47 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-03-08 at 7.41.54 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-03-08 at 7.41.59 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-03-08 at 7.42.32 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-03-08 at 7.43.01 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-03-08 at 7.43.19 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-03-08 at 7.43.35 AM.png

       

11 Comments
scottjm
Advisor

This absolutely has to get into Phase 2 of wish list project!!

Nader
Booster

Thank you

NateLumen
Enthusiast

Totally agree, and have it be an option on more types of elements too!

hmartell
Booster

Would also like to have a "By Model View" Option.

Then in the Model View I'd Add a Plan Cut Settings.

 

My goal is to have as close to a 3D plan cut view as possible (order stacked elements by Z-value, etc.)

 

Patrick M
Advisor

I think I had a thread in the wishes forum on a type of display order manager. Currently, all we have is guess and check "bring forward, send to back, bring to front" type juggling. 
One thing that can help with display order is the Element Info Pallet (under window > pallets), it lists display order group. You can also reset display order. But seems like there should be a better approach to display order.
As for plan cut seetings, there is a floor plan cut plane setting per view; I don't think we need to roll that into the MVO settings.

Hi @Patrick M,

 

If I can disagree with you & with all respected (24) likes?

 

Really, I think that every element has its own required and expected display settings which were developed year by year to match the actual needs.

 

But at the same time, I don’t mind to see that in Archicad despite unifying functions is not always the ideal solution, otherwise you want Archicad to be the same like Revit.

roderick
Booster

Totally agree, this should hopefully be consistent throughout the different model elements !

Space_Agency
Booster

Absolutely agree. Just keep it consistent so that the options are flexible for all elements. 

Govin eric
Contributor

It would great if all items (objects, walls...) could behave the same as slab, meaning, projecting more than 1 up and 1 below, but be flexible in it's projection like "slabs".

Also It would be good if there was more than 1 pen colour to project above/ below. It would allow to create the illusion of depth (like a 1 floor roof could look more distant on the 5 th floor than on the 3 rd floor).

s_p_b
Booster

Yes! We don't always use slabs as floor slabs, or beams as literal beams - so there shouldn't be so many imposed restrictions on visibility across stories.
There are other areas where the tools are inconsistent - beams for example can't display cover fills if they are above the cut plane - what do you do about RCPs? Making them all a 'symbolic' display shouldn't be the solution.

Status
Upvoted

with 78 Votes

Wish details
Product
Labels