2005-06-28 02:48 PM
2005-07-29 12:34 AM
TomWaltz wrote:quite. it's the hierarchical permissions system of the software modules that provides the restrictions and security . . . whatever the chip it's running on.
Huh? What difference would the processor make? Running Linux on an Intel machine does not make it mroe virus prone. Why would OSX?
2005-07-30 02:14 PM
2005-07-30 06:56 PM
laszlonagy wrote:
Maybe Djordje was referring to the fact that in Intel chips there could have been viruses that could use a flaw in the design of the processor. I don't know exactly what it was but somehow they made the processor overflow with data then when it tried to handle this overflow, the virus came into play. Someone else might know how this works. But the point is: a virus might use a security hole in the processor, not the operating system.
2005-07-30 09:15 PM
2005-08-01 01:07 PM
Olivier wrote:
Thanks, Ralph, for this very clear explanation.
2005-08-02 04:11 PM
Fritz wrote:You probably won't see another patchlevel update to 10.3 beyond 10.3.9, but I believe Apple continues to provide security updates as needed. I have a panther machine which got Update 2005-006 on July 3rd.
Do you know if apple continues support for 10.3 even though 10.4 is now the current version?
2005-08-02 05:25 PM