HI Tom,
Thanks for the suggestions. I think i should change the title, which i've done.
Unfortunately none of the above could work.
The first option copy / paste is a waste of human time and creates tremendous amount of layers for the months and hours multiplied by 2 or more (depending on; how many options you have for the proposed site), not even talking about mistakes. Don't forget we also have to color it nicely, a finished document/booklet to the city. etc etc.
At first the way we do it, sounds too much hassle, but when there is a change and we all do know there will be, than my method beats the copy and paste method. Plus you don't get confused, clean and organized.
I do believe computers meant to make our life easier. Copy and paste is = tree chopping.
The second option. Well sounds good but I don't wanna see the buildings, just shadow. But if there is no building in the 3D window, there is no shadow. And where are the property lines, street names, curbs? Yes i could combine them in the layout and put it top of each other, but how can i not show the 3D buildings ugly shaded top-view? I will take a look at it today maybe i could work this around.
BUTTT. Sum it all.
If you think it over, don't you think if they take away something, it should be compensate?
The point is, which I mentioned earlier, the 2DL in the layoutbook, should be an option to be linked as an external document regardless what i wanna use it for. The funny thing is; PMK (which we don't need anymore) is there but 2DL is not.
I guess you see my point now.
Mishi
Mishi Szabo
Urban Strategies Inc.
---------
Dual QuadCore Xeon Intel Mac 8GB Memory