‎2006-01-01 03:58 PM
‎2006-03-02 04:21 AM
MarinRacic wrote:Oh really? Can you define "real" because my work must not fit your definition.
You can't get much real work done there.
‎2006-03-02 07:45 AM
Oh really? Can you define "real" because my work must not fit your definition.For general european practice, not yet there. Over here we're mostly doing things by former DIN-standards and IMO Revit still needs polishing. I've seen some great features in the promo material, but when I tried to use it, it was way too awkward. Blame it on me or the tutorials provided with the software...
‎2006-03-02 08:01 AM
‎2006-03-02 12:59 PM
kliment wrote:I agree. I'm also a veteran user, also since 4.55, but I like to look around to know what I'm talking about when discussing with other users. We'll see what 10?s going to bring!
Ordered a Revit demo this week. Alas, I will never have enough time go do as deep into it as to make a real comparison with AC.
But there must be something wrong when an old AC user starts looking around for other applications. (Using Ac since v4.55 which makes about 12 years.)
‎2006-03-06 01:20 PM
Ordered a Revit demo this week. Alas, I will never have enough time go do as deep into it as to make a real comparison with AC.kliment,
‎2006-03-06 02:27 PM
Rakela wrote:
check the libraries, chances are that you might stop the comparison at that point
‎2006-03-06 09:06 PM
‎2006-03-06 10:17 PM
Rakela wrote:What's in their libraries?Ordered a Revit demo this week. Alas, I will never have enough time go do as deep into it as to make a real comparison with AC.kliment,
check the libraries, chances are that you might stop the comparison at that point
‎2006-03-06 10:25 PM
TomWaltz wrote:1/10 of ArchiCAD libs... Practically usable only for schematic placement of furniture.
What's in their libraries?
‎2006-03-06 10:27 PM
MarinRacic wrote:How is that different?
Practically usable only for schematic placement of furniture.