2006-01-01 03:58 PM
2006-03-02 04:21 AM
MarinRacic wrote:Oh really? Can you define "real" because my work must not fit your definition.
You can't get much real work done there.
2006-03-02 07:45 AM
Oh really? Can you define "real" because my work must not fit your definition.For general european practice, not yet there. Over here we're mostly doing things by former DIN-standards and IMO Revit still needs polishing. I've seen some great features in the promo material, but when I tried to use it, it was way too awkward. Blame it on me or the tutorials provided with the software...
2006-03-02 08:01 AM
2006-03-02 12:59 PM
kliment wrote:I agree. I'm also a veteran user, also since 4.55, but I like to look around to know what I'm talking about when discussing with other users. We'll see what 10?s going to bring!
Ordered a Revit demo this week. Alas, I will never have enough time go do as deep into it as to make a real comparison with AC.
But there must be something wrong when an old AC user starts looking around for other applications. (Using Ac since v4.55 which makes about 12 years.)
2006-03-06 01:20 PM
Ordered a Revit demo this week. Alas, I will never have enough time go do as deep into it as to make a real comparison with AC.kliment,
2006-03-06 02:27 PM
Rakela wrote:
check the libraries, chances are that you might stop the comparison at that point
2006-03-06 09:06 PM
2006-03-06 10:17 PM
Rakela wrote:What's in their libraries?Ordered a Revit demo this week. Alas, I will never have enough time go do as deep into it as to make a real comparison with AC.kliment,
check the libraries, chances are that you might stop the comparison at that point
2006-03-06 10:25 PM
TomWaltz wrote:1/10 of ArchiCAD libs... Practically usable only for schematic placement of furniture.
What's in their libraries?
2006-03-06 10:27 PM
MarinRacic wrote:How is that different?
Practically usable only for schematic placement of furniture.