Bent section cuts
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-20 10:33 AM


I've been trying to get the section cuts in AC10 to bend. I'm working on a large site with buildings at different orientations and need to be able to cut a site section to display the front elevations of each of the buildings. The difference between orientations is only 10 degrees.
Whilst I have managed now to get sections to bend by fiddling around a bit, I cannot find a way to get the bend to the correct angle. Also the method in which I’ve been using the section line does not yield consistent results.
Can anyone help??
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-20 03:17 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-20 04:24 PM
I suspect you would need to make different markers for each angle.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-20 05:02 PM
TomWaltz wrote:... and join them in the layouts if needed.
I'm not aware of any way to bend a section marker. You can offset it, but not bend it.
I suspect you would need to make different markers for each angle.
Elevation is a planar projection by definition; therefore it should not bend ...
ArchiCAD since 4.55 ... 1995
HP Omen
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-20 11:13 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-21 12:19 AM
Djordje wrote:This is true but there are times when it would be very, very useful to be able to create a curved/bent elevation.
Elevation is a planar projection by definition; therefore it should not bend ...
Such as drawing flattened/unrolled elevations of a curved curtain wall. Do this on just about every project I have worked on in the last few years and the fact these need to be drawn in 2D despite having a detailed 3D facade model frustrates me no end.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-21 12:55 AM
Hopefully bent sections won't be too far away.
Cheers,
Link.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-21 11:02 PM
owen wrote:
... it would be very, very useful to be able to create a curved/bent elevation.
Such as drawing flattened/unrolled elevations of a curved curtain wall....
Yes it would be a nice feature in theory BUT I cannot see it being practical for two reasons.
1. I get enough stupid questions from contractors without giving them "false" elevations to try and work with!
2. Unless the SE has a zero horizontal extent or at least a very very small one, then mathematically, it would be impossible because parts of the model would have to converge or diverge in some way.
It's fine to draw a schematic type elevation in 2D like this but it cannot work in true 3D

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-22 12:36 AM
Philip wrote:The facade contractors I have worked with generate shop drawings of exactly what I am talking about - a single, flat (i.e fake) elevation of a curtain wall which curves in several places. It is the only way to clearly lay out all the panel types along a facade. We provide the same type of elevations in our tender sets (together with the traditional 'true' ones) as we have found it easier for everyone to understand just how it all fits together.owen wrote:
... it would be very, very useful to be able to create a curved/bent elevation.
Such as drawing flattened/unrolled elevations of a curved curtain wall....
Yes it would be a nice feature in theory BUT I cannot see it being practical for two reasons.
1. I get enough stupid questions from contractors without giving them "false" elevations to try and work with!
Philip wrote:Whilst it is difficult to achieve I disagree that it can't work - its just a matter of programming. Yes there would need to be a line along which everything flattened is a true dimension. Things infront/behind that would be stretched/compressed to take account of the horizontal extent.
2. Unless the SE has a zero horizontal extent or at least a very very small one, then mathematically, it would be impossible because parts of the model would have to converge or diverge in some way.
It's fine to draw a schematic type elevation in 2D like this but it cannot work in true 3D
I'm sure there must be applications out there that can do this for manufacturing but i don't know what for sure. Perhaps CATIA? A machine has to know at some point what 'flat' shape a curved metal sheet actually is in order to cut it?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2007-03-22 02:23 PM
I'm sure there must be applications out there that can do this for manufacturing but i don't know what for sure. Perhaps CATIA? A machine has to know at some point what 'flat' shape a curved metal sheet actually is in order to cut it?TouchCAD is one such program: http://www.touchcad.com/tc3features.html
Provides nurbs modeling of complex shapes with unfolding and reverse engineering capabilities. Very good for modeling boats, sails and the like. A very neat program.