2005-09-01 12:13 AM - last edited on 2023-05-26 03:13 PM by Rubia Torres
2005-09-02 08:48 AM
TomWaltz wrote:His elevation is unlinkedDjordje wrote:What Window width? I'm not sure what you mean by that.
Or, click on the line that represents the window width and open Object info. It will tell you the lenght.
2005-09-03 05:15 AM
Rakela wrote:i tend to agree... maybe not a footing tool, but that time would be better spent developing the virtual building components rather than a measuring tool.
in version 5 or 6 when i first looked at ac that was my first question to the reseller, dont u have a measuring tool??...now, i dont care about that tool anymore,,, i would rather much better have a footing tool instead. . .
2005-09-03 05:23 AM
2005-09-03 05:27 AM
Bruce wrote:we wouldn't be having this discussion if you were modelling instead of drafting either mate!
What's wrong with a measuring tool? We wouldn't be having this discussion if there was a measuring tool
2005-09-07 08:51 PM
2005-09-08 10:02 AM
Bruce wrote:just re-read my post and i can see it came across a little harsh. think i've been guilty of that quite a lot recently. however . . . i
Did you read my first post? I stated there that I inherited this file i.e. the sections and elevations were turned into drawings by the previous owner. I always model.
2005-09-08 03:42 PM
2005-09-08 03:45 PM
~/archiben wrote:Ben, harsh or flippant?? No way!
[just re-read my post and i can see it came across a little harsh. think i've been guilty of that quite a lot recently. however . . . ididnotice that you had inherited the file, but my remark wasn't quite as flippant as you might have thought: if you always model, why not re-model the thing? may save time in the long run. you'll probably be able to re-use the annotation if there is any . . .
2005-09-08 09:42 PM