Hello to everybody!I have a question regarding the future of Archicad
tools, especially regarding new tools. We are a firm that do both
architectural and structural projects. As we have seen, Graphisoft is
going to enlarge its scope thansk to DDS-CAD...
Hi, What do you think about not showing the stairs finish elements in
both 2D (plan, section, elevation) and 3D when "Without finishes" /
"Core only" / "Core of load bearing elements only" is selected?
Hi there, I think giving us the possibility to customize the info box
even more, could bring to a lot of time saving and bigger productivity
levels. With this and example would be to give us the possibility, for
each element (doors, windows, zones, e...
As I am currently trying to make an internal office standard, I have
seen that some elements are not needed to be modeled, but must be taken
into account for quantity take-offs. One way to solve this is to give us
the possibility to classify and show...
Yeah a lot can be done with IDs, but there are still flaws. An example
are window shadings not showing on schedules. There are things that
still need improvement is what I am saying, but most of the things are
ok. Don't you think it could be useful u...
I do completely agree on that matter. Contrabim did a really good job. I
have just finished my studies, it is my first job and it has been just a
year since I started working with archicad and I loved it because it is
user friendly. I see a lot of po...
Maybe you are right. Just better tutorials, manuals and so on, about
workflows in AC and towards other programs could make a mich bigger
impact. I think that a better workflow could help. But I still believe
improvements on schedules and quantity tak...
Hi there, I think Archicad should aim towards implementing features
needed during the whole construction planning. The thing that I think we
need the most are improvemets on quantity take-offs with interactive
schedules (more listing parameters for a...