2008-04-30 02:47 PM
2008-04-30 02:56 PM
2008-04-30 03:58 PM
2008-05-01 06:26 AM
2008-05-01 08:05 PM
2008-05-01 08:28 PM
owen wrote:It's still built on Archicad. I guess there is still a revenue stream from the licenses, now without the marketing costs.
They had an opportunity when Constructor was part of their product line - this was a revenue stream built from augmenting an existing product
2008-05-01 09:31 PM
Chazz wrote:No, there's really not. There's a huge difference between maintaining and existing product in a platform and completely porting it to another platform, especially when that program is completely written in Visual Studio.
Autodesk has not killed off Maya on OSX so maybe there is hope of a Mac version of Revit
2008-05-02 01:08 AM
What a disappointment. Went to the annual RAIA conference and associated design exhibition in Sydney a few weeks ago. It is the largest building product exhibition in Australia. Autocad and Revit were prominant but guess who was missing? No prizes here - no ArchiCad! Was chasing building material information on the net and came accross companies producing details for about 6 CAD packages - even for DataCad would you believe. But --you guessed it --- not ArchiCad.AFAIK GS Australia is a privately own operational unit and completely separate to GS Hungary HQ. So, if AC was not there I would direct my displeasure to GS-AU directly as I reckon, they are responsible for this marketing blunder. (and they will all hate me after reading this)
2008-05-02 03:00 AM
Thomas wrote:True .. although it is only a license fee, not the profit from the full product. There is efficiency in a larger development & marketing team working under a single banner than two independent companies. Also does this mean the Constructor guys have to rely on updates to ArchiCAD to develop their own product? I can't see that lasting very long. It just doesn't make sense to me to have two separate companies when 70%+ of their product is the same.owen wrote:It's still built on Archicad. I guess there is still a revenue stream from the licenses, now without the marketing costs.
They had an opportunity when Constructor was part of their product line - this was a revenue stream built from augmenting an existing product
2008-05-02 03:53 PM
TomWaltz wrote:Mind you, Maya was ported fairly recently (but I think before Alias was acquired by Autogiant). The more relevant difference is that there was, and is, a Linux version of Maya.Chazz wrote:No, there's really not. There's a huge difference between maintaining and existing product in a platform and completely porting it to another platform....
Autodesk has not killed off Maya on OSX so maybe there is hope of a Mac version of Revit