Exploding Morphs
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-09-14
06:03 PM
- last edited on
2023-05-24
07:30 PM
by
Rubia Torres
2012-09-14
06:03 PM
4 REPLIES 4

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-09-14 06:07 PM
2012-09-14
06:07 PM
Why don't you edit the shape of the Morph directly?
Also you can perform SEOs on Morphs, like subtract the body of one Morph from the body of another.
Also you can perform SEOs on Morphs, like subtract the body of one Morph from the body of another.
Loving Archicad since 1995 - Find Archicad Tips at x.com/laszlonagy
AMD Ryzen9 5900X CPU, 64 GB RAM 3600 MHz, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), Windows 10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac28
AMD Ryzen9 5900X CPU, 64 GB RAM 3600 MHz, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), Windows 10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac28

Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2012-09-17 03:38 AM
2012-09-17
03:38 AM
Or use the "split" tool to cut them up into smaller chunks.
You can always join them again afterwards.
Barry.
You can always join them again afterwards.
Barry.
One of the forum moderators.
Versions 6.5 to 27
i7-10700 @ 2.9Ghz, 32GB ram, GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB), Windows 10
Lenovo Thinkpad - i7-1270P 2.20 GHz, 32GB RAM, Nvidia T550, Windows 11
Versions 6.5 to 27
i7-10700 @ 2.9Ghz, 32GB ram, GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB), Windows 10
Lenovo Thinkpad - i7-1270P 2.20 GHz, 32GB RAM, Nvidia T550, Windows 11
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-09-03 09:17 AM
2014-09-03
09:17 AM
Exploding a morph into the individual faces would be a possible workaround to schedule surface areas of individual faces, which is (still) not possible in ArchiCAD.
E.g. to do a quick heat-loss/energy estimate based on a "Mass Model" (the way many people use Revit or SketchUp in a concept phase).
In the example below, I created a single Morph Volume with the desired outer shell of a house. Placed it on a separate layer.
On a copy of the volume, I manually selected each individual face, assigned a Surface and turned the selection into a Morph (so it got detached from the volume). This individual flat morph can then be placed on a proper layer.
I created two schedules and filtered out the morphs according their layers.
This is a very labour intensive effort, but is the exact result I would like to obtain in one step, namely by being able to schedular surface areas of all faces of the morph.
E.g. to do a quick heat-loss/energy estimate based on a "Mass Model" (the way many people use Revit or SketchUp in a concept phase).
In the example below, I created a single Morph Volume with the desired outer shell of a house. Placed it on a separate layer.
On a copy of the volume, I manually selected each individual face, assigned a Surface and turned the selection into a Morph (so it got detached from the volume). This individual flat morph can then be placed on a proper layer.
I created two schedules and filtered out the morphs according their layers.
This is a very labour intensive effort, but is the exact result I would like to obtain in one step, namely by being able to schedular surface areas of all faces of the morph.
--- stefan boeykens --- bim-expert-architect-engineer-musician ---
Archicad28/Revit2024/Rhino8/Solibri/Zoom
MBP2023:14"M2MAX/Sequoia+Win11
Archicad-user since 1998
my Archicad Book
Archicad28/Revit2024/Rhino8/Solibri/Zoom
MBP2023:14"M2MAX/Sequoia+Win11
Archicad-user since 1998
my Archicad Book
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2014-09-27 08:45 PM
2014-09-27
08:45 PM
Interesting workaround Stefan!
I'm still looking for a similar way to do a "material take-off" on the interior of the building.
Doing this by using zones gives ± correct measured areas, but the inside/outside is sometimes switched around (according to the position of the reference line i guess).
I really hope GS will make (better) data-extraction a priority for 19, it would convince a lot more architects to switch to BIM/ArchiCAD...
(e.g. allow more 'own' calculations in the schedules, allowing importing of xls-files to build schedules faster, giving more control over surfaces in a composite to be measured - for more precise results, ...)
I'm still looking for a similar way to do a "material take-off" on the interior of the building.
Doing this by using zones gives ± correct measured areas, but the inside/outside is sometimes switched around (according to the position of the reference line i guess).
I really hope GS will make (better) data-extraction a priority for 19, it would convince a lot more architects to switch to BIM/ArchiCAD...
(e.g. allow more 'own' calculations in the schedules, allowing importing of xls-files to build schedules faster, giving more control over surfaces in a composite to be measured - for more precise results, ...)