We value your input!
Please participate in Archicad 28 Home Screen and Tooltips/Quick Tutorials survey

Modeling
About Archicad's design tools, element connections, modeling concepts, etc.

Partition area in plan

Carlos Schwarz
Participant

Hi,

 

we are trying to list on a schedule the area that partitions occupy in plan but including the area where we have a door and taking into account wall intersections. Any suggestions?

 

We can't find the right parameter in AC24 or AC25, the closest would be to use "Area (general)" but that excludes the door's area.

We have tried creating our own property and multiplying "end thickness of wall" x "length of reference wall" but it  doesn't take into consideration the wall intersections (it double counts the area in the intersection).

 

We just found that in AC18 there was a parameter called "Area of wall" that is close to what we need but it seems to be gone? (even if in the description it says that "Wall intersections have no effect on the area value": https://help.graphisoft.com/AC/18/INT/AC18Help/03_2_Views_Virtual_Building/03_2_Views_Virtual_Buildi...)

 

We'll appreciate any suggestions. Thanks!

Carlos Schwarz Rodriguez, Architect
Lyall Bills & Young Architects, London
Archicad 24 6004 UKI Full on macOS Big Sur v11.6
iMac 27-inch 2020, i5 3.1Ghz i5, 32 GB 2667 Mhz DDR4, AMD Radeon Pro 5300 4 GB
12 REPLIES 12
Vinicius Guedes
Graphisoft Alumni
Graphisoft Alumni

Hello, @Carlos Schwarz 

 

Could you illustrate your question with some prints and what's your objective, please?

Hi Vinicius,

 

Sure, I tried to be as descriptive as possible but I guess the image helps. See attached below:

 

On the left you have the modelled partitions and on the right I have measured with red hatches what we are trying to list: the "partition plan area" (a projection of the area occupied but the walls). 

On the schedule at the bottom you can see the results for the property "area" and for our custom property as described in my first message. 

 

Thanks again!Screenshot 2021-09-21 at 16.20.16.jpg

Carlos Schwarz Rodriguez, Architect
Lyall Bills & Young Architects, London
Archicad 24 6004 UKI Full on macOS Big Sur v11.6
iMac 27-inch 2020, i5 3.1Ghz i5, 32 GB 2667 Mhz DDR4, AMD Radeon Pro 5300 4 GB
Vinicius Guedes
Graphisoft Alumni
Graphisoft Alumni

Thanks, @Carlos Schwarz, I got your point 😉

 

I found the correct results using the "Area" parameter in the schedule settings, as you can see in the images.

 

To double-check it, I created another fill schedule.

 

Could your share your schedule setting, so we can compare it?Screen Shot 2021-09-21 at 12.32.18.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 12.32.34.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 12.32.45.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 12.32.52.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 12.33.00.png

I am not sure how you got the same areas, it seems that your wall area calculation is not considering the wall intersection? If they have the same lenght they shouldn't be both 0,20?) I think is just a coincidence they are matching, in the hatches the walls that are crossing have a reduction of 0,04 and on the walls the wall with the door has a reduction of 0,04). Can you double check with a smaller door please?

 

See below my screenshots. I can send you my pln as well, it's just a quick test file.

 

Screenshot 2021-09-21 at 17.03.47.jpgScreenshot 2021-09-21 at 17.12.29.jpg

 

See my screenshots

Carlos Schwarz Rodriguez, Architect
Lyall Bills & Young Architects, London
Archicad 24 6004 UKI Full on macOS Big Sur v11.6
iMac 27-inch 2020, i5 3.1Ghz i5, 32 GB 2667 Mhz DDR4, AMD Radeon Pro 5300 4 GB
Vinicius Guedes
Graphisoft Alumni
Graphisoft Alumni

@Carlos Schwarz I double-checked, and that's what I found:

 

I made 5 walls, 5 x 0,20 m each, then I've 5 m2 in total.

 

I intersected 2 walls, and it was reduced 0,4 m2, that was correct.

 

3 different doors were placed and the result was still the same, what seems to fit your expectation, right?

 

You can share the .pla file here, via WeTransfer link, so I can check it out.Screen Shot 2021-09-21 at 14.15.17.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 14.15.23.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 14.16.44.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 14.16.50.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 14.17.30.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 14.17.33.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 14.18.49.pngScreen Shot 2021-09-21 at 14.18.52.png

Laszlo Nagy
Community Admin
Community Admin

You guys may be using different Archicad versions (Ac24 vs AC25).

If I recall correctly, Ac25 includes some new ways of calculating area and volume quantities in schedules. Could that be the difference?:

 

https://helpcenter.graphisoft.com/user-guide-chapter/86698/

Loving Archicad since 1995 - Find Archicad Tips at x.com/laszlonagy
AMD Ryzen9 5900X CPU, 64 GB RAM 3600 MHz, Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB, 500 GB NVMe SSD
2x28" (2560x1440), Windows 10 PRO ENG, Ac20-Ac27
Carlos Schwarz
Participant

Thanks both,

 

I think you may be right Laszlo as I was using AC24, but I have been playing a bit with those settings in AC25 and I didn't manage to get it right yet.

 

@Vinicius Guedes Yes, what you are showing is what I would like to achieve. Are you using AC25? can you share the calculations settings?

 

Here is my file if you have a moment to check it: https://we.tl/t-1hcD9qtHGK

 

Thanks!

Carlos Schwarz Rodriguez, Architect
Lyall Bills & Young Architects, London
Archicad 24 6004 UKI Full on macOS Big Sur v11.6
iMac 27-inch 2020, i5 3.1Ghz i5, 32 GB 2667 Mhz DDR4, AMD Radeon Pro 5300 4 GB
Carlos Schwarz
Participant

Hi all,

 

I still can't find the way to make the "area" behave like @Vinicius Guedes did, can anyone help? Here is a short video showing how the area of the doors is substracted (we wish it was not) and showing my Archicad version and the calculation settings:

 

https://we.tl/t-bnARxP0SCQ

 

Thanks!

Carlos Schwarz Rodriguez, Architect
Lyall Bills & Young Architects, London
Archicad 24 6004 UKI Full on macOS Big Sur v11.6
iMac 27-inch 2020, i5 3.1Ghz i5, 32 GB 2667 Mhz DDR4, AMD Radeon Pro 5300 4 GB
Vinicius Guedes
Graphisoft Alumni
Graphisoft Alumni

Hello, @Carlos Schwarz ,

 

After several attempts, I found why the results are different, and I'm checking a way to work around it