Richard wrote:
Oleg Shmidt's curtain objects are mathematically impressive. Generating the parametrically adjustable (and very realistic) cloth folds is just incredible.
I agree with you, Richard. Oleg is a champion. He too, wrote a 3D mesh object, alas without thickness. Too late now.
Back to topic. IMO, Mesh to Roof is a bit outdated.
Not any smooth surfaces, or hiden edges +
exorbitant polycount. Too much static.
Vertical thickness only. Perpendicular thickness is impossible to manage. To keep polite.
SEO method preserves smoothness, but allows only vertical thickness. SEOs slow down calculation time.
Better if both options (vertical & perpendicular thickness) could be fully implemented into the mesh tool.
Hard work, i can figure. This is a long & old wish, it never hurts to ask GS from time to time.
@ schagemann : by vertical & perpendicular thickness, i mean this.
I am not sure if my explanations are understandable.