2008-05-09 09:47 AM
2008-05-28 01:09 PM
Ledbetter, wrote:Ok then,Karl wrote:Gee, how nice for you that you can have such a cavalier attitude...
So, a Texas reseller might have been booted? And unauthorized information on web sites was taken down. How is this wrong or unusual?
Macbook Pro M1 Max 64GB ram, OS X 10.XX latest
another Moderator
2008-05-28 03:00 PM
ejrolon wrote:My intended point (apparently it wasn't clear) was that the "booting" of this Texas reseller isLedbetter, wrote:Ok then,Karl wrote:Gee, how nice for you that you can have such a cavalier attitude...
So, a Texas reseller might have been booted? And unauthorized information on web sites was taken down. How is this wrong or unusual?
- If I have a contract with your office and it stipulates that I cannot show or talk about it (NDA).
- One of your bosses talks to somebody about part of the project publicly.
- That means that my NDA is broken, I can post the information to my website, tell other clients all about it and you will do nothing about it?
2008-05-28 05:59 PM
Ledbetter, wrote:"Telling" someone
My intended point (apparently it wasn't clear) was that the "booting" of this Texas reseller isheavy-handed and unfounded, IMO, because nothing was truly "disclosed"...THAT is how its wrong.
2008-05-28 07:21 PM
TomWaltz wrote:...nothing was told, nothing was disclosed..."implied" or even "hinted" is neither of those.Ledbetter, wrote:"Telling" someone
My intended point (apparently it wasn't clear) was that the "booting" of this Texas reseller isheavy-handed and unfounded, IMO, because nothing was truly "disclosed"...THAT is how its wrong. isdisclosing. It doesn't have to be in writing.
Someone signed a contract not to let the word out. They let the word out, so they are in breech of contract. They are lucky just to be fired. They could get sued as well.
2008-05-28 09:48 PM
Ledbetter, wrote:
so is your reseller going to getcannedby Graphisoft for divulging sacred secrets like mine was for posting a stupid video that told nothing of new features but was considered a breach of the "non-disclosure agreement"?
2008-05-28 09:52 PM
Stress wrote:Yep...
Was he "canned" for THIS? (the video has been removed).
2008-05-29 02:14 AM
Ledbetter, wrote:If that's the case, then I don't understand... that video had nothing to do with AC 12.... so how could it violate any contract? Weird.Stress wrote:Yep...
Was he "canned" for THIS? (the video has been removed).
2008-05-29 03:51 AM
Ledbetter, wrote:OK, then that is weird.Stress wrote:Yep...
Was he "canned" for THIS? (the video has been removed).
2008-05-29 05:22 AM
2008-05-29 08:51 AM
Brett wrote:there
Obviously Graphisoft haven't a sense of humour, and the one person in the marketing department hasn't anything better to do.