Slab Edge
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-16
12:09 AM
- last edited on
ā2023-05-25
05:39 PM
by
Rubia Torres

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-17 02:03 AM
You could use Solid Element Operations on the mesh your using for the soil.
Footing and Stem wall are Operators, Mesh the Target - Subtract.
As for the thickened slab edge and slab - you may want to consider merging them into a morph so they can be all one monolithic element. ?
This is a curious detail. Why is the slab edge thickened?
ArchiCAD 25 7000 USA - Windows 10 Pro 64x - Dell 7720 64 GB 2400MHz ECC - Xeon E3 1535M v6 4.20GHz - (2) 1TB M.2 PCIe Class 50 SSD's - 17.3" UHD IPS (3840x2160) - Nvidia Quadro P5000 16GB GDDR5 - Maxwell Studio/Render 5.2.1.49- Multilight 2 - Adobe Acrobat Pro - ArchiCAD 6 -25
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-17 02:21 AM
Thanks. I will use the SEO to subtract the footing from the mesh. But that is what I did for the wall. I was just curious about the role of priority in this aspect, because if it works for many materials, it should for the mesh.
As for the thickened edge slab, even if it is a non-structural slab on grade and it does not support any bearing load, I always thickened the edge of slab so that when it is loaded with anything heavy it will hold, including differential settlement. In this case, the slab is for a garage.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-17 03:59 AM
If the slab is a composite (as mine is here even though it only has one skin) then it must use the same BM as the thickening in the composite settings.
My thickening is just a simple slab with an angled edge but it could have also been a composite.
They must also touch exactly top to bottom.
If there is a gap or they overlap then you will see the line of the top and bottom surfaces.
Unfortunately the footing (slab) and mesh do not interact automatically in section (3D).
You must perform a Solid Element Operation on them.
There is no Priority Based Connections for meshes.
Barry.
Versions 6.5 to 27
i7-10700 @ 2.9Ghz, 32GB ram, GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB), Windows 10
Lenovo Thinkpad - i7-1270P 2.20 GHz, 32GB RAM, Nvidia T550, Windows 11
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-17 04:19 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-17 04:33 AM
Cheikh wrote:I have also done it where the thickening was saved as a complex profile as a beam only and it still merges in section.
The problem was the fact that the complex profile was saved and used as a beam. Once I edited the complex profile to make it a wall and not just a beam only, the two merged.
The good thing about using complex profile is it can clash (overlap) with the slab and it will still merge - unlike if both are slabs.
Barry.
Versions 6.5 to 27
i7-10700 @ 2.9Ghz, 32GB ram, GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB), Windows 10
Lenovo Thinkpad - i7-1270P 2.20 GHz, 32GB RAM, Nvidia T550, Windows 11
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-17 04:48 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-17 05:01 AM
I didn't notice that this post is in the 'Schedules' section of the forum so I have moved it to the "working in Archicad' section.
Barry.
Versions 6.5 to 27
i7-10700 @ 2.9Ghz, 32GB ram, GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB), Windows 10
Lenovo Thinkpad - i7-1270P 2.20 GHz, 32GB RAM, Nvidia T550, Windows 11
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-17 05:04 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ā2015-04-17 11:04 PM
Garage slabs have a slope, and usually multiple slopes if you model the slope on each side of the garage door to prevent water traps. Sometimes they have a floor drain too. That, and for a slab that has special geometry on the bottom, the regular Slab is never adequate. This is why you may want to consider making it into a morph at some point. Not just for the graphics.
I start with a roof for the sake of uniform thickness and slope.
The complex profile beam is good because you can give it a slope to match a roof/slab.
In the end, my garage slab ends up being a morph because there is no other single element that can have all of these things I want, and is easy to adjust for each new project I re-use it in.
ArchiCAD 25 7000 USA - Windows 10 Pro 64x - Dell 7720 64 GB 2400MHz ECC - Xeon E3 1535M v6 4.20GHz - (2) 1TB M.2 PCIe Class 50 SSD's - 17.3" UHD IPS (3840x2160) - Nvidia Quadro P5000 16GB GDDR5 - Maxwell Studio/Render 5.2.1.49- Multilight 2 - Adobe Acrobat Pro - ArchiCAD 6 -25