2005-07-13 09:41 PM
2005-12-09 04:30 AM
Bruce wrote:Sounds similar to solid element operations...
...Revit's way of doing it is brilliant - once you trim, it stays stuck to that roof until you say otherwise. Much easier.
2005-12-09 04:33 AM
2005-12-09 04:38 AM
2005-12-09 04:39 AM
Bruce wrote:Actually SEO's are more advanced and are the preferred method (IMHO of course); however there may be times that you do not wish the trim to follow or rely on an operator; for these trim to roof is more practical.
Hmmm. I might start using SEO for my roof trims instead. But that begets the question - why are the two so dissimilar in function and result?
2005-12-09 12:43 PM
Bruce wrote:I think it's just historical. Trim to Roof existed first and just was not removed when SEOs came along.
Hmmm. I might start using SEO for my roof trims instead. But that begets the question - why are the two so dissimilar in function and result?
2005-12-12 06:05 AM
I've started using SEO instead of roof trim lately. Handy when you alter roof height and trims go with it. Not handy when you want to know which walls you've trimmed (get no feedback in settings, like "undo roof trim" button).
Both ways have +'s and -'s
2005-12-12 02:29 PM
TomWaltz wrote:Actually, Graphisoft can't simply do away with Trim to Roof, because its needed if you use modules for parts of your model that contain the trimmed components. Basically, SEOs don't work with modules...so you gotta' use trim to roof in these cases.
...I think it's just historical. Trim to Roof existed first and just was not removed when SEOs came along.